On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Maybe it should be recalled to everyone that debconf is not a place for
> asking users a bunch of stupid crap (how many % of our users know what
> is SNMP ?), but a place to configure the few things that cannot be
> autodected. Tha
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:45:04PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
[...]
> So my complaints list about debconf questions is:
> 1. Bad grammar or spelling (in the English templates);
> 2. Questions/notes that assume too much background knowledge; and
> 3. Questions/notes which are just too trivial to w
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 07:15:13PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Should we have a review of all debconf questions on debian-qa perhaps?
> > Anyone interested?
>
> That would be interesting.
> Translating some debconf entries, some look too difficult.
> I guess many people are looking at debconf
> Should we have a review of all debconf questions on debian-qa perhaps?
> Anyone interested?
That would be interesting.
Translating some debconf entries, some look too difficult.
I guess many people are looking at debconf questions while translating,
but aren't very expressive about it.
regar
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> After re-reading my message, I would like to apologize for having been
> unnecessarily rude, being already tense for other reasons.
Apology accepted.
> I don't want to handle libnet-perl, but I can try to provide a patch
> for that specific issue if
On Monday 14 April 2003 14:13, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Please, kick out all those questions. They have nothing to do here and
> should be replaced by either configuration files or autodetection. There
> have been 4 bug reports for more than 6 months asking for this and you
> haven't even replied
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I'd like to congratulate Michael Alan Dorman for the most stupid and
> annoying use of debconf. The bunch of questions asked on the libnet-perl
> installation are just annoying people installing it for what it is : a
> dependency f
Michael Alan Dorman a écrit :
> Josselin,
>
> As I have publically stated before, I will happily give up this
> package to someone who is obviously motivated to improve it
>
> Are you that person?
After re-reading my message, I would like to apologize for having been
unnecessarily rude, being a
On Monday 14 April 2003 14:30, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Maybe it should be recalled to everyone that debconf is not a place for
> asking users a bunch of stupid crap (how many % of our users know what
> is SNMP ?), but a place to configure the few things that cannot be
> autodected. Thank you.
I
Josselin,
As I have publically stated before, I will happily give up this
package to someone who is obviously motivated to improve it
Are you that person?
Mike
En réponse à Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe it should be recalled to everyone that debconf is not a place
> for
> asking users a bunch of stupid crap (how many % of our users know what
> is SNMP ?), but a place to configure the few things that cannot be
> autodected. Thank you.
And
I'd like to congratulate Michael Alan Dorman for the most stupid and
annoying use of debconf. The bunch of questions asked on the libnet-perl
installation are just annoying people installing it for what it is : a
dependency for packages needing networking functionality for perl.
Please, kick out a
12 matches
Mail list logo
