Quoting Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> A common way is to list the contact address for the group
> as maintainer and each person responsible for uploads in Uploaders.
> You miss non official Debian developers this way though.
This is the way d-i packages are handled.
This is also the way I
Ola Lundqvist dijo [Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 10:37:33AM +0200]:
> > * Sean Perry [Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:36:49 -0800]:
> >
> > > Source: mysource
> > > Maintainer: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Maintainers: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > I left the Maintainer in place to a
#include
* Frank Küster [Tue, Mar 29 2005, 02:25:03PM]:
> Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some people call that file MAINTAINERS, some README.svn or similar, and
> > some do not do this at all, so someone needs to ask somebody or get a
> > crystal ball to learn about the repository of
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello fellow maintainers,
>
> with organisation in groups becoming more and more popular, IMO it is now
> time to find some convention for declaring the group members and
> guidelines inside of the Debian source package.
>
> Some people call that file MAIN
* Ola Lundqvist [Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:37:33 +0200]:
> A common way is to list the contact address for the group
> as maintainer and each person responsible for uploads in Uploaders.
> You miss non official Debian developers this way though.
Nothing mandates that the Uploaders field is DD-only, A
On Monday 28 March 2005 12:30, David Schmitt wrote:
> On Monday 28 March 2005 00:04, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > I suggest debian/README.Debian.Maintainers as the filename.
>
> Hmm .. Following from README to README.Debian, wouldn't AUTHORS.Debian make
> more sense?
>
> Also, often this list is already
On Monday 28 March 2005 00:04, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> I suggest debian/README.Debian.Maintainers as the filename.
Hmm .. Following from README to README.Debian, wouldn't AUTHORS.Debian make
more sense?
Also, often this list is already present in debian/copyright ("packaged
by ...")
Regards, Da
Hello
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 07:45:31AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Sean Perry [Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:36:49 -0800]:
>
> > Source: mysource
> > Maintainer: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Maintainers: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I left the Maintainer in place to allow
* Sean Perry [Sun, 27 Mar 2005 18:36:49 -0800]:
> Source: mysource
> Maintainer: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maintainers: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I left the Maintainer in place to allow for some backwards
> compatibility. This could be the 'captain' of the project.
Eduard Bloch wrote:
So I suggest to set a kind of soft policy:
every package maintained by a group should keep a file (with a common
filename) in the Debian diff, which tells all neccessary things:
- who are members of that group
- which person from this group is responsible for exactly this pack
Hello fellow maintainers,
with organisation in groups becoming more and more popular, IMO it is now
time to find some convention for declaring the group members and
guidelines inside of the Debian source package.
Some people call that file MAINTAINERS, some README.svn or similar, and
some do not
11 matches
Mail list logo
