On 25.01.2010 09:06, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:50:04AM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 02:36:48AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
>>> Looks like nonsense to me. I think you should file a bug. For one thing,
>>> any init script that needs lsb-base (>=
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:50:04AM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 02:36:48AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Looks like nonsense to me. I think you should file a bug. For one thing,
> > any init script that needs lsb-base (>= 3.0-6) *should depend on lsb-base
> > (>= 3.0-6
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 02:36:48AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Looks like nonsense to me. I think you should file a bug. For one thing,
> any init script that needs lsb-base (>= 3.0-6) *should depend on lsb-base
> (>= 3.0-6)*, not throw an error if it's not installed.
Dependencies do not hel
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek writes:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Michael Welle wrote:
>> several init scripts use such a fragment for sourcing init-functions:
>
>> if ! [ -x "/lib/lsb/init-functions" ]; then
>> . /lib/lsb/i
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Michael Welle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> several init scripts use such a fragment for sourcing init-functions:
>
> if ! [ -x "/lib/lsb/init-functions" ]; then
> . /lib/lsb/init-functions
> else
> echo "E: /lib/lsb/ini
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Michael Welle wrote:
> several init scripts use such a fragment for sourcing init-functions:
> if ! [ -x "/lib/lsb/init-functions" ]; then
> . /lib/lsb/init-functions
> else
> echo "E: /lib/lsb/init-functions
Hello,
several init scripts use such a fragment for sourcing init-functions:
if ! [ -x "/lib/lsb/init-functions" ]; then
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
else
echo "E: /lib/lsb/init-functions not found, lsb-base (>= 3.0-6) needed"
exit 1
fi
What is the reason to bail ou
7 matches
Mail list logo