Re: Source requirements and debian/missing-sources/ (was: "Browserified" stuff)

2016-10-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2016-10-12 21:22, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:00:50PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Who cares about yaccs and > > bisons? > > You're thinking small. Why not ship a pre-compiled ELF, built with some > paid version of ICC (screw silly sods on AMD chips like me[1]). I

Re: Source requirements and debian/missing-sources/ (was: "Browserified" stuff)

2016-10-12 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:00:50PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting Martín Ferrari : > >I had always understood that rebuilding from source was a hard > >requirement. Is this not the case any more? > > > >I don't think that shipping a binary compiled upstream should be > >allowed, so where

Source requirements and debian/missing-sources/ (was: "Browserified" stuff)

2016-10-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting Martín Ferrari : I had always understood that rebuilding from source was a hard requirement. Is this not the case any more? I don't think that shipping a binary compiled upstream should be allowed, so where's the line drawn? This is an interesting question indeed. If it is allowed for