Hello,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 07:50:30PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote
> I'm one of Octave's Debian maintainers.
>
> The problematic part is that qtoctave is primarly a Windows application. I
> don't think they even have any sort of code for generating the HTML files
> from the Texinfo sources
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 16:02:13 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > Am I misunderstanding what you're saying? octave2.9-htmldoc contains
> > this exact documentation that upstream is distributing.
>
> Yes, but built from source, and the source of octave2.9-htmldoc contains
> the texinfo so
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:49:24PM -0400, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 01/07/07, Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >upstream source ships with HTML-only form of the octave's texinfo
> >documentation, which is licensed under GPL. This documentation is
> >actually not in
On 01/07/07, Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
upstream source ships with HTML-only form of the octave's texinfo
documentation, which is licensed under GPL. This documentation is
actually not installed in any binary package (for many reasons).
Am I misunderstanding what you're saying?
Vincent Fourmond writes ("Source package containing HTML-only form of texinfo
doc"):
> I am currently reviewing the qtoctave package (#430731) before
> sponsoring it. The package is now in a pretty good shape, excepted with
> a problem for which I would like to have some a
Hello all,
I am currently reviewing the qtoctave package (#430731) before
sponsoring it. The package is now in a pretty good shape, excepted with
a problem for which I would like to have some advice: the qtoctave
upstream source ships with HTML-only form of the octave's texinfo
documentation,
6 matches
Mail list logo
