Re: Some suggestion

On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 03:59:18 +0800, pei deng wrote: >I think debian should release a publish version with roll updating as >archlinux. and remove testing and sid version. Kindly try to understand how Debian's release process works before suggesting things. Greetings Marc --

Re: Some suggestion

2011/12/2 Игорь Пашев : > +1. Also there is no much difference between unstable and testing. > > > 2011/12/3 Mike Dupont >> >> so what is the difference, I am using unstable and it rolls >> mike >> Testing/Unstable/Experimental are kind-of rolling - it is rolling two months after release and

Re: Some suggestion

2011/12/2 pei deng : > I think debian should release  a publish version with roll updating as > archlinux. and remove testing and sid version. > > because 'roll' is really a very good mechanism for software publish and > test. > And how would then Debian continue releasing stable? Debian is especi

Re: Some suggestion

+1. Also there is no much difference between unstable and testing. 2011/12/3 Mike Dupont > so what is the difference, I am using unstable and it rolls > mike > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:59 PM, pei deng wrote: > > I think debian should release a publish version with roll updating as > > ar

Re: Some suggestion

so what is the difference, I am using unstable and it rolls mike On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:59 PM, pei deng wrote: > I think debian should release  a publish version with roll updating as > archlinux. and remove testing and sid version. > > because 'roll' is really a very good mechanism for sof

Some suggestion

I think debian should release a publish version with roll updating as archlinux. and remove testing and sid version. because 'roll' is really a very good mechanism for software publish and test. -- *Regards,* *Deng Pei* * * *Software Engineering Institute* *HP GDSCA CDC* *Fedora Project Maint