On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 11:10:55 +0200
Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anything that I can do about it? Tuning the ext3 partition? Or is
> somebody capable of turning the info directory into - say - an sqlite
> database or in future Debian releases?
There is a thread on debian-d
On Friday 30 March 2007 22:25, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Christoph Haas:
> > What might be the cause? Is there some fragmentation effect?
>
> It's probably ext3's directory hashing. It tries to access the files
> in /var/lib/dpkg/info in hash order, which leads to essentially random
> disk I/O.
I
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Indeed it accounts for some part of the problem; after I cloned and
> > replaced my /var/lib/dpkg/info tree with the copy, the figure dropped
> > from 22 seconds to 15 seconds.
> It's not that. It's /var/lib/dpkg/available.
Err, I timed before an
* Adam Borowski:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:57:03PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Indeed it accounts for some part of the problem; after I cloned and
>> replaced my /var/lib/dpkg/info tree with the copy, the figure dropped
>> from 22 seconds to 15 seconds.
>
> It's not that. It's /var/lib/dpk
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:57:03PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Indeed it accounts for some part of the problem; after I cloned and
> > replaced my /var/lib/dpkg/info tree with the copy, the figure dropped
> > from 22 seconds to 15 seconds.
>
> It's
> "Roberto" == Roberto C Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting. I have ~1600 packages installed on my development machine
> and I do not experience the slowness you talk about. It was installed
> about 3.5 years ago.
> How much RAM/CPU does the machine have? How fast are the di
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Adam Borowski wrote:
> It's not that. It's /var/lib/dpkg/available.
>
> Try this:
>
> for x in /var/lib/apt/lists/*Packages;do dpkg --merge-avail "$x";done
> (or "dselect update")
> Install+purge of an empty package:
> 9-ish seconds on one box (my home desktop, years
* Christoph Haas:
> What might be the cause? Is there some fragmentation effect?
It's probably ext3's directory hashing. It tries to access the files
in /var/lib/dpkg/info in hash order, which leads to essentially random
disk I/O.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:57:03PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Indeed it accounts for some part of the problem; after I cloned and
> replaced my /var/lib/dpkg/info tree with the copy, the figure dropped
> from 22 seconds to 15 seconds.
It's not that. It's /var/lib/dpkg/available.
Try this:
f
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Joey Hess wrote:
> It can also lead to a kind of "fragmentation", since during an initial
> install these files tend to be fairly close together on disk while over
> time new files will be scattered about and more seeking needed to read
> them all.
Indeed it accounts for som
Hi,
* Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-30 20:29]:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
> > installed packages is terribly slow at times.
>
> I think dpkg spends a lot of time reading all /var/lib/dpkg/in
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I think dpkg spends a lot of time reading all /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list
> files. These are not big and this is typically in cache between dpkg
> runs, and I think this is the reason that cold dpkg runs are very very
> slow.
It can also lead to a kind of "fragmentation", s
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007, Christoph Haas wrote:
> It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
> installed packages is terribly slow at times.
I think dpkg spends a lot of time reading all /var/lib/dpkg/info/*.list
files. These are not big and this is typically in cache
debian sid installed about 9 years ago, actually on amd64 (but with
32bit kernel and 32bit userland ) sempron 3300+ with 1 gigs of ram.
The system is on a dm-crypted in aes256 device over software raid1 composed
by two slow ide disks, (so, I/O is *VERY* slow), i have something like 2500
packages
On 3/30/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what has always annoyed me is now ready to be asked on this list. :)
It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
installed packages is terribly slow at times. I have roughly 1800 packages
installed and it sometimes
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:11:46PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2007 15:43, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database
> > > of installed packages is te
On Friday 30 March 2007 15:43, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database
> > of installed packages is terribly slow at times.
>
> Interesting. I have ~1600 packages installed
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Dear list...
>
> what has always annoyed me is now ready to be asked on this list. :)
> It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
> installed packages is terribly slow at times. I have roughly 1800 pac
Dear list...
what has always annoyed me is now ready to be asked on this list. :)
It appears like apt-get/aptitude/dpkg dealing with the list/database of
installed packages is terribly slow at times. I have roughly 1800 packages
installed and it sometimes takes 20-30 seconds to install a single
19 matches
Mail list logo
