Re: Six Bullseye packages that should be Priority: optional

2021-07-05 Thread Daniel Lewart
Simon, et al, Thank you for your excellent feedback! On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 at 10:40:28 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 at 02:30:00 -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote: > > Comparing important/required/standard packages between > > Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies. > W

Re: Six Bullseye packages that should be Priority: optional

2021-07-05 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 05 Jul 2021 at 02:30:00 -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote: > Comparing important/required/standard packages between > Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies. We have been in hard freeze for almost 4 months[1], so I don't think now is necessarily the right time to be changing what is

Six Bullseye packages that should be Priority: optional

2021-07-05 Thread Daniel Lewart
Debian Developers, Comparing important/required/standard packages between Buster and Bullseye, I noticed some inconsistencies. Below are six Bullseye packages that I think should have Priority: optional, with justifications. 1) Are the justifications valid? 2) If so, should I file one or multip