Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:32:27PM +, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2011-06-10, Svante Signell wrote: > > Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in > > the debian/control file? > > > > Package: ntp > > Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any) > > Depends: ... > > No,

Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

On 2011-06-10, Svante Signell wrote: > Thank you for your reply. Is it possible to use the negative form too in > the debian/control file? > > Package: ntp > Architecture: !hurd-any (instead of any) > Depends: ... No, but "linux-any kfreebsd-any" might work. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UN

Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 13:10 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Svante Signell writes: > > > Hi, > > > > Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm > > porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the > > source. Is there an easy way to achieve th

Re: Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

Svante Signell writes: > Hi, > > Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm > porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the > source. Is there an easy way to achieve this, e.g. by an override > statement. Or is brute force, removing all entries

Short question how to avoid creating one of two binary packages from source

Hi, Tried to google but did not find any useful so far. I have a package I'm porting, and want to create one out of two binary packages from the source. Is there an easy way to achieve this, e.g. by an override statement. Or is brute force, removing all entries of that binary package in debian/rul