On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > But what about HPLIP? No volunteers for it?
>
> i do have a lot of various models using hplip.. but i'm not actually in
> search for new packages.. what about torsten, doesn't he want to take over?
I wouldn't mi
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> But what about HPLIP? No volunteers for it?
i do have a lot of various models using hplip.. but i'm not actually in
search for new packages.. what about torsten, doesn't he want to take over?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Bi
On Wed, 08 Aug 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> So, this mail is a request for new maintainers for both hplip and
> amavisd-new.
I've already had three people (two DDs and a non-DD) join in for amavisd-new
work. So it looks like it will be well-cared for in the future.
But what about H
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007, Gregory Colpart wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:11:24PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > [...]
> > The requirements for amavisd-new is a good grasp of perl and email
> > infrastructure, and the usual careful attitude one should have when dealing
> > with packa
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 11:11:24PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> [...]
> The requirements for amavisd-new is a good grasp of perl and email
> infrastructure, and the usual careful attitude one should have when dealing
> with packages that are often mission-critical. Upstream
Unfortunately, due to various reasons I have been unable to dedicate as much
time and effort as HPLIP and amavisd-new require, lately (as in I couldn't
dedicate any effort to them, really).
Both of these packages are team-maintained in alioth (pkg-hpijs and
amavisd-new projects, respectively), but
6 matches
Mail list logo
