Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-25 Thread Stefan Hornburg
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:26:22 -0400 (EDT) Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:45:11 +0100 > > Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:51:51PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > sysklogd tries to be better; it adapts to the current configuration rather > than leaving it up to the user to update a logrotate.d file if they change > the configuration. # If you want to rotate other logfiles daily,

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:43:04PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own > > rotation[...] > Because sysklogd doesn't have a fixed set of log files. I prefer to have a default logrotate script which has some "missingok,notifempty" statem

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:46:01PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote: > Matt Zimmerman said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:43:04PM -0400: > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote: > > > > > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own > > > rotation[...] > > > >

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Mark Ferlatte
Matt Zimmerman said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:43:04PM -0400: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote: > > > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own > > rotation[...] > > Because sysklogd doesn't have a fixed set of log files. It does have a _defa

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote: > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own > rotation[...] Because sysklogd doesn't have a fixed set of log files. -- - mdz

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread deblists
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:45:11 +0100 Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes, > > I have no idea which package is responsible for that. > > Any suggestions ? > >

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Mark Ferlatte
Steve Kemp said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:45:11PM +0100: > > While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes, > > I have no idea which package is responsible for that. > > Any suggestions ? > > /etc/cron.weekly/sysklogd > > This script rotates all the files which are output

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Carlos Sousa
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:18:27 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes, > I have no idea which package is responsible for that. > Any suggestions ? > > That would help me to solve bug #212237. Perhaps /etc/cron.weekly/sysklogd, from packag

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Graham Wilson
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes, > I have no idea which package is responsible for that. > Any suggestions ? logrotate. -- gram signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread Steve Kemp
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes, > I have no idea which package is responsible for that. > Any suggestions ? /etc/cron.weekly/sysklogd This script rotates all the files which are output from

Rotation of /var/log/mail.log

2003-09-23 Thread deblists
Hello, fellow developers ! While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes, I have no idea which package is responsible for that. Any suggestions ? That would help me to solve bug #212237. Any help is welcome. Thanks Racke -- LinuXia Systems => http://www.linuxia.de/ E