On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:43:42PM +0200, chris h wrote:
> I could not find any references to debootstrap installations with
> the new /run setup.
>
> How is debootstrap - and any other program installing Debian -
> supposed to handle /run, esp. with the initscripts postinst
> detecting chroots an
Roger,
I could not find any references to debootstrap installations with
the new /run setup.
How is debootstrap - and any other program installing Debian -
supposed to handle /run, esp. with the initscripts postinst
detecting chroots and it not bringing in the preferred setup?
Thanks,
-ch
(Pl
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:26:59PM +0100, Edward Allcutt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:38:34PM +0100, Edward Allcutt wrote:
> >Your assumption is correct in that this is a fallback. This is the
> >special case for chroots, also co-opted for vservers
Edward Allcutt writes:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> This I really don't get. There was no error reported, and we're using
>> this logic:
>>
>> if [ ! -L /var/run ] && [ -d /var/run ]; then
>>echo "guest environment detected: Migrating /var/run to /run"
>>( # Remove /run f
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:38:34PM +0100, Edward Allcutt wrote:
Your assumption is correct in that this is a fallback. This is the
special case for chroots, also co-opted for vservers, which don't "boot"
per se, and don't run the rcS scripts. The conseque
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:38:34PM +0100, Edward Allcutt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >This I really don't get. There was no error reported, and we're using
> >this logic:
> >
> >if [ ! -L /var/run ] && [ -d /var/run ]; then
> > echo "guest environment detected: Migrating /
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
This I really don't get. There was no error reported, and we're using
this logic:
if [ ! -L /var/run ] && [ -d /var/run ]; then
echo "guest environment detected: Migrating /var/run to /run"
( # Remove /run first, so all contents get moved
rm -f
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:55:20PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:19:38PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I think this should be fixed now; could you possibly try again
> > (you'll need a clean vserver environment that hasn't been upgraded
> > before). The updated packages
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:19:38PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:1
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:29:31AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > I have now implemented this (th
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:22:33PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > I have now implemented this (though it's not the default).
> > >
> > > I would very much appreciate i
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I have now implemented this (though it's not the default).
> >
> > I would very much appreciate it if anyone could take the time to
> > install the new initscripts and
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:35:24PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:24:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > I have now implemented this (th
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:24:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > find: `var/run': No such file or directory
> > fakerunlevel: open("/var/run/utmp"): No such file or directory
> When is this, in postinst or init scripts? We have logic
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 02:24:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > I have now implemented this (though it's not the default).
> > >
> > > I would very much appreciate i
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 03:20:38PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > I have now implemented this (though it's not the default).
> >
> > I would very much appreciate it if anyone could take the time to
> > install the new initscripts and
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:49:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I have now implemented this (though it's not the default).
>
> I would very much appreciate it if anyone could take the time to
> install the new initscripts and test it out.
>
> http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/run/sysvinit_2.88dsf-1
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:23:04PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:51:50AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:51:09 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > > I don't think symlinking /tmp to /run would be a good idea, as one could
> > > fill up
> > > /tmp (acci
18 matches
Mail list logo
