* Antonio Diaz Diaz [Fri Feb 18, 2011 at 05:58:22PM +0100]:
> Michael Prokop wrote:
>> I'm the maintainer of the ddrescue and gddrescue packages.
>> I plan to drop the ddrescue package.
> IMHO dropping the gddrescue package and moving GNU ddrescue to the
> ddrescue package (replacing dd_rescue)
* Luca Capello [Thu Feb 17, 2011 at 12:05:18AM +0100]:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:17:58 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> > I'm the maintainer of the ddrescue and gddrescue packages.
> > I plan to drop the ddrescue package.
> [...]
> > I'd like to get rid of this confusion now. AFAICT gddrescue provid
Hello Mika et all,
Michael Prokop wrote:
I'm the maintainer of the ddrescue and gddrescue packages.
I plan to drop the ddrescue package.
IMHO dropping the gddrescue package and moving GNU ddrescue to the
ddrescue package (replacing dd_rescue) is the least confusing solution
for the users in
Hi there!
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 23:17:58 +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> I'm the maintainer of the ddrescue and gddrescue packages.
> I plan to drop the ddrescue package.
[...]
> I'd like to get rid of this confusion now. AFAICT gddrescue provides
> all the features (and even more) ddrescue does. Als
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the ddrescue and gddrescue packages.
I plan to drop the ddrescue package.
Background:
ddrescue provides the dd_rescue binary, gddrescue provides the
ddrescue binary. As you might notice this is far from a perfect
situation and confuses users.
* ddrescue = http://www.g
5 matches
Mail list logo