Re: Steve Langasek in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link
> > > time reference (/usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.10)
>
> > I don't know this problem is "missing GLIBC_2.2 symbols" issue. It
> > does not clear Christoph's problematic archit
Hi Goto,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:54:54PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:30:57 -0800,
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:19:36PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > > I upgraded a Woody box last week to Sarge's glibc/apt/dpkg/
> > > openoffice.org/perl last
At Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:30:57 -0800,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:19:36PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > I upgraded a Woody box last week to Sarge's glibc/apt/dpkg/
> > openoffice.org/perl last week. The result was that Woody's mysql does
> > not work with Sarge's glibc. It c
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 01:19:36PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Henning Makholm in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Huh? I run one machine that is mostly woody but with sarge's libc6 and
> > a few selected other sarge packages. This seems to work impeccably in
> > general (I do know where to point my
Re: Henning Makholm in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Huh? I run one machine that is mostly woody but with sarge's libc6 and
> a few selected other sarge packages. This seems to work impeccably in
> general (I do know where to point my anger at when it doesn't, but in
> those casses libc has never been invo
* Henning Makholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050124 04:40]:
> Scripsit "SR, ESC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Scripsit Geoff Bagley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Is it possible to transfer some of the packages, a few at a time,
> >> > over into Woody, so that when we all change to Sarge, the servers
> >> > wil
Scripsit "SR, ESC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Scripsit Geoff Bagley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Is it possible to transfer some of the packages, a few at a time,
>> > over into Woody, so that when we all change to Sarge, the servers
>> > will not suffer from too heavy an overload ?
> also the plain simp
Le dim 2005-01-23 a 17:48:47 -0500, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a dit:
> Scripsit Geoff Bagley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Is it possible to transfer some of the packages, a few at a time,
> > over into Woody, so that when we all change to Sarge, the servers
> > will not suffer from too heav
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 08:11:03PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
[snip]
> Kernel updates
> --
>
> One noteworthy source of open release-critical bugs are the kernel
> packages. There have been a number of security vulnerabilities
> identified in the kernel over the past few weeks, in
Scripsit Geoff Bagley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Is it possible to transfer some of the packages, a few at a time,
> over into Woody, so that when we all change to Sarge, the servers
> will not suffer from too heavy an overload ?
That would be a recipe for disaster. In no particular order:
* It would
Hello Steve,
Firstly I am an enthusiastic user of Debian GNU/Woody.
When the change-over to the new Sarge release occurs, there is a danger of
server overload as the entire Debian community attempts to do a broadband
up-grade from Woody to Sarge.
Is it possible to transfer some of the package
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 01:27:59PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Release-update of this month sounds really nice for me :-)
> At Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:11:03 -0800,
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Many of these security bugs have been fixed in unstable, and are just
> > waiting to propagate to testing -- l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Release-update of this month sounds really nice for me :-)
At Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:11:03 -0800,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Many of these security bugs have been fixed in unstable, and are just
> waiting to propagate to testing -- largely blocked by m
13 matches
Mail list logo