Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 22, 2004

2004-10-28 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:41:42PM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > Could the script that generates the RC bug list be modified to show two > additional numbers for each bug: first, how old it is (in days), and > second, how old (in days) is the last message posted to the bug? > > This w

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 22, 2004

2004-10-27 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. Could the script that generates the RC bug list be modified to show two additional numbers for each bug: first, how old it is (in days), and second, how old (in days) is the last message posted to the bug? This will allow to see easilly (i.e

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 22, 2004

2004-10-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 11:20:39PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:51:45AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote: > > For people who care about getting sarge out, it's not useful to put out > > a report listing 726 bugs, only 150 of which matter, in a form that > > makes i

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 22, 2004

2004-10-26 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:51:45AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote: > > For people who care about getting sarge out, it's not useful to put out > a report listing 726 bugs, only 150 of which matter, in a form that > makes it rather difficult to cleanly extract only the 150 that matter. > How about putting o

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for October 22, 2004

2004-10-26 Thread Joe Buck
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 06:30:02AM -0700, BugScan reporter wrote: > Bug stamp-out list for Oct 22 06:02 (CST) > > Total number of release-critical bugs: 726 ... > Number that are being ignored: 45 > Number on packages not in testing: 420 > Number concerning the next release (excluding ignored and