"Scott K. Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, show me how to search a HTML version of the bash info documentation
> for a concept and I'll believe you.
Absolutely, anything without regex and incremental search is broken
and unacceptable for documentation purposes (IMO).
--
Rob
--
TO UN
[ CC'ed to Christian for policy question, and to Manoj for VM example. ]
Marco> Ask the users! The most people hate the info format and it's
Marco> browsers. We should include the HTML documentation in the package.
But they get html via the dwww package! Which gives them _more_ documentation
Dirk> However, Christian Schwarz asked me to do html as well. That will be
Dirk> some work as HOWTO packages comes as tar.gz files with no
Dirk> surcompassing index.html. I'll have to do some perl hacking. No
Dirk> promises for the June release, maybe for July.
Christian> Just unpack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 20 Jun 1997, Marco Budde wrote:
> SVD> The simplest solution is to ship html in a different package. This way
> SVD> the user will be able to choose to not install the html docs if he/she
> SVD> believes info2www is enough.
>
> Ask the users! The most people
Am 16.06.97 schrieb sanvila # unex.es ...
Moin Santiago!
SVD> The simplest solution is to ship html in a different package. This way
SVD> the user will be able to choose to not install the html docs if he/she
SVD> believes info2www is enough.
Ask the users! The most people hate the info format a
> "MB" == Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MB: The most beginners don't like info because there's no good
MB: browser. I would vote for texi2html because it look's much
MB: better than info2html and the user doesn't need a WWW server.
There is one good info browser: GNU Ema
On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[snip]
> However, Christian Schwarz asked me to do html as well. That will be some
> work as HOWTO packages comes as tar.gz files with no surcompassing
> index.html. I'll have to do some perl hacking. No promises for the June
> release, maybe for July
Lars> It was decided many moons ago that Debian would use HTML as its
Lars> primary on-line documentation format. HTML should be the default.
Marco> That's right. But a lot of important packages like doc-linux don't
Marco> use HTML.
Well, the maintainer (that's me) prefers info as the b
Am 16.06.97 schrieb liw # iki.fi ...
Moin Lars!
LW> It was decided many moons ago that Debian would use HTML as its
LW> primary on-line documentation format. HTML should be the default.
That's right. But a lot of important packages like doc-linux don't use
HTML.
LW> is done with texi2html. Fo
9 matches
Mail list logo
