> MB> Why should we ship info files? HTML is better format. The most
> MB> system will use HTML as their help system in the future. KDE for
> MB> example uses HTML.
>
> The Info format is a lot better, tecnically, than HTML. That's what
> I've heard. Maybe the problem is that there is no Info brow
> "MB" == Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MB> Why should we ship info files? HTML is better format. The most
MB> system will use HTML as their help system in the future. KDE for
MB> example uses HTML.
The Info format is a lot better, tecnically, than HTML. That's what
I've heard. Mayb
Am 25.06.97 schrieb joey # kite.ml.org ...
Moin Joey!
JH> I haven't been following this thread closely (catching up on mail backlog
JH> after vacation), but the reason I've heard why it's not acceptable to ship
JH> only info files and convert to html on the fly is because the converter in
JH> dww
Am 26.06.97 schrieb alegre # saturn.superlink.net ...
Moin Fernando!
a> If we want to have HTML as the default we would have to put some effort
a> into fixing bugs in the converters. A converter fixed means many documents
a> fixed, while a document fixed is just one document fixed. We would have
Am 21.06.97 schrieb schwarz # monet.m.isar.de ...
Moin Christian!
CS> 2. The new "deity" (dselect successor) will simplify the handling of
CS> >1000 packages very much. I had another idea: Perhaps we could deity
CS> adopt to have an overall switch about which documentation the
CS>
5 matches
Mail list logo