On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:14:45AM +0100, Hans Kratz wrote:
> >No, it can build vmware-player .debs as well. I'll fix the wrong
>
> Ah, I see. I will take a look at vmware-package. Do you plan on
> supporting VMware Server as well?
As it is documented in the package docs, and a bug in the BTS, to
Hi!
No, it can build vmware-player .debs as well. I'll fix the wrong
Ah, I see. I will take a look at vmware-package. Do you plan on
supporting VMware Server as well?
-- Hans
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 06:46:18PM +0100, Hans Kratz wrote:
> Sure. I wasn't aware of that package. AFAICS that package handles only
> the VMware kernel modules right now.
No, it can build vmware-player .debs as well. I'll fix the wrong
description in svn.
Greetings
Marc
--
Hi!
HK> After repeatedly seeing interest in VMware Player packages for
HK> Debian I decided to post my work on packaging VMware Player. It
HK> should work fine on sarge and sid. Currently only i386 is
HK> supported, support for x86-64 is on my TODO list.
That was supposed to read *etch* an
Twas brillig at 12:27:07 when Hans Kratz did gyre and gimble:
HK> After repeatedly seeing interest in VMware Player packages for
HK> Debian I decided to post my work on packaging VMware Player. It
HK> should work fine on sarge and sid. Currently only i386 is
HK> supported, support for x86-64
* Uwe Hermann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:36:35PM +0300, Linas ??virblis wrote:
> > Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a
> > partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was
> > not an option when there actu
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:36:35PM +0300, Linas ??virblis wrote:
> Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a
> partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was
> not an option when there actually was no alternative to it, so why is it
> an opti
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:03:31 +0200, Bernd Schubert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Ubuntu already has vmware kernel module packages
>
> Yes, but adapting them to Debian seems to be nontrivial. I have not
> yet been able to get them build on Debian.
Actually I didn't have muc
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:03:31 +0200, Bernd Schubert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ubuntu already has vmware kernel module packages
Yes, but adapting them to Debian seems to be nontrivial. I have not
yet been able to get them build on Debian.
Greetings
Marc
--
--
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:06:59 +0100, Peter Collingbourne
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
>>repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
>>a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vm
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:06:59 +0100, Peter Collingbourne
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
>repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
>a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
>and vmware-mo
On Sunday 13 August 2006 09:18, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > * using snapshots and clones based off them are quite useful
>
> Lvm snapshots work just fine.
You've obviously never run VMware if you think that an LVM snapshot is a
replacement for a VMWare snapshot. It leaves me suspicious that
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:59:57AM +0100, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > > reposi
At 1155469573 past the epoch, martin f krafft wrote:
> Why don't those that want to work with QEMU do that, and
> those who want to work with VMware worry about its
> packaging?
>
> I can't believe we're having this discussion anyway.
It would make sense for each team to keep an eye on what
each
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, [UTF-8] Linas Žvirblis wrote:
maybe not with a so nice UI than vmware, but that is definitely
writeable IMHO.
That is being worked on as I type this.
OT, but does anybody know whether I can operate on VMs in
VMware without this fancy UI? I just want to turn on two VMs on
On Aug 13, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you aren't running windows then xen is your free alternative. If
> you need windows then you need a recent cpu for xen+windows.
I always love when somebody knows what I need...
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
>> > repository, nor any way of creating them.
also sprach Sebastian Harl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1658 +0100]:
> There is vim available from Debian repositories as well as emacs.
Yes, but emacs will be removed.
(this is a reply-to experiment)
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. kr
Hi,
> > vmware
>
> QEMU:
I really don't get this (type of) discussion...
Some people prefer qemu, some others vmware, still others prefer foo.
There is vim available from Debian repositories as well as emacs. You can
install KDE as well as Gnome, fvwm, ... why not provide qemu as well as bochs
Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
> and vmware-modules-source packages based on
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> maybe not with a so nice UI than vmware, but that is definitely
> writeable IMHO.
That is being worked on as I type this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le dim 13 août 2006 15:24, Adrian von Bidder a écrit :
> On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > > repository, nor any way of cre
Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> vmware
QEMU:
> * is quite fast
Quite fast with the accelerator module. There is also full
virtualization mode, that can be used with certain operating systems.
> * does suspend/resume quite beautifully
It can save memory state and load it later on startup.
> * t
On Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> > a tool that will build (f
also sprach Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1236 +0200]:
> I know that QEMU Accelerator is not distributable, but providing a sort
> of an installer (or even asking an author for a permission to
> distribute) should not be any harder than providing an installer for
> VMware. Both nee
Alle Sunday 13 August 2006 04:06, Goswin von Brederlow ha scritto:
> What you mean is vserver and even more so xen. I hear with the latest
> versions you can even run windows in xen.
You can do that only if your CPU is enabled with VT/Pacifica
virtualization technology.
Regards,
Francesco
--
Loïc Minier wrote:
> Would be nice if we could go as far as shipping binary packages for
> e.g. vmware-player, as Ubuntu does:
Oh come one guys. So instead of providing QEMU + QEMU Acclerator, a
partially free solution, we just go for totally non-free one? VMware was
not an option when there actu
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
> and vmware-modules-source packages based on
also sprach Peter Collingbourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.0106 +0100]:
> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to
> create a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server)
> vmware-server and vmware-modu
also sprach Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.0125 +0100]:
> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> > a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
> > and vmware-
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
>> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
>> a tool that will build (for example fo
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> > a tool that wil
Alle Sunday 13 August 2006 02:25, Pierre Habouzit ha scritto:
> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> > a tool that will b
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 02:25:59AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> > repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> > a tool that wil
Le dim 13 août 2006 02:06, Peter Collingbourne a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
> I found there were no VMware-related packages in the official
> repository, nor any way of creating them. Thus I propose to create
> a tool that will build (for example for VMware Server) vmware-server
> and vmware-modules-so
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to:
Jorge Araya (Mailbox or Conference is full.)
Sudhakar Chandrasekharan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Lamb proclaimed:
> > I've seriously considered forking over the $99 so I can convert
> > my machine machine to a dual-boot system with Windows running
> > inside Linux. I wouldn't want to run games on a VM so I would
> > dual-boot for t
Steve Lamb proclaimed:
> I've seriously considered forking over the $99 so I can convert
> my machine machine to a dual-boot system with Windows running
> inside Linux. I wouldn't want to run games on a VM so I would
> dual-boot for that, but for most of the applications
> that I do need in Window
39 matches
Mail list logo
