On Sun 07 Jan 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:05:57AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> > jed-sl-ja is not built anymore (note that it is "out of date" on
> > ALL architectures). Does this mean it won't be installed into
> > woody until someone manually removes jed-sl-ja_0.98.
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 01:05:57AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> The same seems to be the problem with the following:
> * jed-ja 0.99.10.jp0-3 (currently 0.98.7.j055-2) (low)
> + out of date on alpha: jed-sl-ja (from 0.98.7.j055-2)
> + out of date on arm: jed-sl-ja (from 0.
On Sat 23 Dec 2000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Since libadns0 and libadns0-dev seem to be out of date on all architectures,
> it probably means they're not being built anymore, and need to be removed
> from unstable. Whether there are up to date bins on an arch is more just
> to give a hint at what
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 06:14:08PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> That's not entirely trivial, so it might take a while, but it does seem
> like a decent idea. What sort of reports would we be talking about,
> exactly?
Well, would be enough for me to get a mail like the one i get from
debinstall ev
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One easy way would be if you provided a set of web pages by maintainer,
> then I could just "subscribe" a lynx --dump cron job to mine..
It would be very nice to get such information automatically but I
don't care how I get it so the above would work fine.
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:18:30PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Ya know, I wouldn't mind subscribing to a customized update excuses report
> > weekly or so, to keep track of which of my packages arn't in testing and
> > why.
>
> That's not entirely trivial, so it might take
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:08:48PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've been puttering around on the excuses page and it'd be really nice
> if it included (or had links to) information about what version of each
> package (if any) is actually installed in woody.
Added, hopefully.
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 a
Ya know, I wouldn't mind subscribing to a customized update excuses report
weekly or so, to keep track of which of my packages arn't in testing and why.
--
see shy jo
I've been puttering around on the excuses page and it'd be really nice
if it included (or had links to) information about what version of each
package (if any) is actually installed in woody.
I mean, I can look that up every time for each of my packages, but..
--
see shy jo
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 04:04:03AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> if i take for example:
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/~ajt/update_excuses.html
> adns 1.0-3 (low)
> Maintainer: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> adns is 27 days out of date!
> out of date on alpha:
10 matches
Mail list logo
