Re: unixODBC vs. iODBC

2005-03-31 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:53:57PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Debian currently ships two ODBC driver managers, unixODBC (source > package "unixodbc") and iODBC (source package "libiodbc2"). These > basically do the same thing. Every package that wants to provide > database access through

Re: unixODBC vs. iODBC

2005-03-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:53:57PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >That in turn forces the user to set up each ODBC drivers twice, once for > each driver manager. Not true; the driver managers are supposed to share config files. > Well, the above is mostly true because you can build the program

Re: unixODBC vs. iODBC

2005-03-31 Thread Stephen Frost
* Brian Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Qt in Debian must build against libiodbc2-dev because otherwise it would > have a circular build-dependency with unixodbc. Circular build-deps aren't necessairly a real problem. There's a fair amount of other stuff which have them and in general I think

Re: unixODBC vs. iODBC

2005-03-31 Thread Brian Nelson
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:53:57PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Debian currently ships two ODBC driver managers, unixODBC (source > package "unixodbc") and iODBC (source package "libiodbc2"). These > basically do the same thing. Every package that wants to provide > database access through