Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Posting a simple mail like "I can't predict why we might want to move
> > it, but it seems like a possibility we should leave open and yes,
> > ftp-master was a symbolic name, but isn't the best one now. Please use
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, MJ Ray wrote:
> Posting a simple mail like "I can't predict why we might want to move
> it, but it seems like a possibility we should leave open and yes,
> ftp-master was a symbolic name, but isn't the best one now. Please use
> the new symbolic names." a few messages back mig
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> It's just the usual nit-picking on anybody who actually does anything to
> improve our infrastructure. [...]
It's also combined with the usual failure by many people who improve
our infrastructure to accept they wrote a confusing email (ftp-maste
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > Your second mail (the one referenced in this thread) said:
>
> Can please someone tell me exactly for the sake of what, we are having
> this sub-thread? It just looks pointless to m
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:17:44AM +0100, Simon Huggins wrote:
> Your second mail (the one referenced in this thread) said:
Can please someone tell me exactly for the sake of what, we are having
this sub-thread? It just looks pointless to me ...
Pretty please, drop it, and go back helping kicking
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:15:58AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Instead, you seem to be saying, "how could anyone be so stupid as to use
> > a non-symbolic name?" when nobody is actually being that stupid. We're
> > just using the symbolic name we were told to use the last time the names
> > we
> Instead, you seem to be saying, "how could anyone be so stupid as to use
> a non-symbolic name?" when nobody is actually being that stupid. We're
> just using the symbolic name we were told to use the last time the names
> were changed.
I never intended to say that and my initial mail didnt do
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 07:59 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Also, is it really interesting to the average DD where this queue is?
> People should be able to upload and expect their packages to end up in
> the archive. It really *absolutely* does not matter if that upload goes
> straight to ftp-master
>> > Please always only use the symbolic names for the places to upload to
>> > (ie ftp.upload.debian.org and ssh.upload.debian.org), do not use any
>> > machine name directly. Queues may move at any time, without further
>> > notice and the symbolic names will be updated.
>> What conceivable reaso
>> Please always only use the symbolic names for the places to upload to
>> (ie ftp.upload.debian.org and ssh.upload.debian.org), do not use any
>> machine name directly. Queues may move at any time, without further
>> notice and the symbolic names will be updated.
> What conceivable reason is the
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 21:51 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 04:59:58PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Please always only use the symbolic names for the places to upload to
> > (ie ftp.upload.debian.org and ssh.upload.debian.org), do not use any
> > machine name directly. Que
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 21:51 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 04:59:58PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Please always only use the symbolic names for the places to upload to
> > (ie ftp.upload.debian.org and ssh.upload.debian.org), do not use any
> > machine name directly. Que
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 04:59:58PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Please always only use the symbolic names for the places to upload to
> (ie ftp.upload.debian.org and ssh.upload.debian.org), do not use any
> machine name directly. Queues may move at any time, without further
> notice and the symbol
13 matches
Mail list logo
