Hello,
On Mon 11 Apr 2022 at 05:51PM +01, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> They also pointed out that there is some code from StackOverflow,
>> which is not GPL-3+.
>
> I think this is not right? I think you are referring to
> `argparseactionnoyes.py`. As I documented in the file header, it is
> part of S
Quoting Mike Gabriel (2022-04-11 21:59:12)
> For d/copyright maintenance I use my update-copyright.in script [1]. I
> run it on the source package's base folder.
[...]
> [1]
> https://github.com/sunweaver/MyHomeConfig/blob/master/bin/update-copyright.in
You should no longer need licensecheck2
On 4/11/22 21:59, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Mo 11 Apr 2022 18:51:35 CEST, Ian Jackson wrote:
Another team member identified that there is code in this package
under a number of different licenses other than GPL-3+, but that is
not specified in sufficient detail in d/copyright. That cont
Hi Ian,
On Mo 11 Apr 2022 18:51:35 CEST, Ian Jackson wrote:
Another team member identified that there is code in this package
under a number of different licenses other than GPL-3+, but that is
not specified in sufficient detail in d/copyright. That contravenes
both Debian Policy and the term
Quoting Ian Jackson (2022-04-11 18:51:35)
> For transparency, I am CCing this reply to debian-devel, and quoting
> the whole of the REJECTED mail. There does not seem to be anything in
> here that ought to be private. Please let me know if there is
> somewhere better. (I considered -legal but
Firstly, thanks to ftpmaster for your thorough review of this package.
For transparency, I am CCing this reply to debian-devel, and quoting
the whole of the REJECTED mail. There does not seem to be anything in
here that ought to be private. Please let me know if there is
somewhere better. (I co
6 matches
Mail list logo
