On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 07:08:50AM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:22:04AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > BTW: The interaction between the two MySQL server packages in
> > unstable/sarge at purge time is *ahem* interesting.
> > They are really time bombs ready to exp
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:22:04AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> BTW: The interaction between the two MySQL server packages in
> unstable/sarge at purge time is *ahem* interesting.
> They are really time bombs ready to explode in a few days or
> years.
> It seems RC bugs are requ
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 12:15:43AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:54:10AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:10:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
>
> > > > >Ideally, we would have agreem
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 03:54:10AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:10:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
> > > >Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages
> > > >to
> > > >libmysqlclie
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 09:10:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
>
> > >Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
> > >libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
>
> > I would suggest that libmysqlclient14 should
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:10:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
> libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
>
> courier
> cyrus-sasl2
> exim4
> linesrv
> pam-mysql
> postfix
> proftpd
^^^
yet do
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:52:02PM -0500, Adam M. wrote:
> >Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
> >libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
> I would suggest that libmysqlclient14 should be used if possible. MySQL
> has changed the way passwords are stored in the
Steve Langasek wrote:
>Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
>libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
>
>
I would suggest that libmysqlclient14 should be used if possible. MySQL
has changed the way passwords are stored in the database and this
prevents clients f
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> We have daily builds and the normal upload in
>
> http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/pool/unstable/main/amd64/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-images_20041227_amd64.tar.gz
>
> I guess you want that untared to
> /dists/sarge/main/installer-amd64/ on the n
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:40:25AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > Unfortunately, quite a few important packages still Build-Depend
> > on libmysqlclient10-dev:
> >
> > cyrus-sasl2
> > cyrus-sasl2-mit
> Frozen. I will gladly update them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M.A. Cater) writes:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
>> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture
>> ---
>>
>> At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting
>>
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Jochens wrote:
>> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture
>> ---
>>
>> At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting
>> team decided to release a version of sarge for am
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture
Yes! Very good move. Congrats. Keep it up.
Greetings
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
>> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture
>> ---
>>
>> At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting
>> team decided to relea
Hello Kurt,
thank you for the clarifications.
On 05-Apr-25 19:49, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> > gnustep-base - + does not build with gcc-3.3 (needs gcc >= 3.4)
> It looks like it builds fine with gcc-3.3. But if my memory is
>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture
> ---
>
> At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting
> team decided to release a version of sarge for amd64
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:36:36PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>
> Does that mean amd64 installer come without a mailer by default? Or will the
> amd64 installer install a different mailer?
The problem is that the old version of libmysqlclient-lgpl was
build before we switched to an nptl onl
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
>
> There are still a few packages in sarge which fail to build from source
> on amd64. Those packages will not be part of the amd64 release of sarge.
I've made a list list on saterday too which included all patched
versions in the
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> portslave- "pppd.h: No such file or directory"
>
> Hmm, you may want to re-check this against current versions of ppp and
> portslave.
I just re-checked this again and now portslave builds fine in testing,
thanks.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Monday 25 April 2005 14.51, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> libmysqlclient-lgpl - Linuxthreads test has to be switched off for
> >> amd64
[...]
> Unfortunately, quite a few important packages still Build-Depend
> on libmysqlclient10-dev:
> exim4
Does that mean amd64 inst
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Unfortunately, quite a few important packages still Build-Depend
> on libmysqlclient10-dev:
>
> cyrus-sasl2
> cyrus-sasl2-mit
Frozen. I will gladly update them if the release team tells me to go ahead
and do it.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One
On 25-Apr-05, 04:32 (CDT), Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package BTS Bug Problem description
> --- ---
> amynth #274703+ missing '#include ' in main.cc
Or possibly '#include ', depending on
Andreas Jochens wrote:
mn-fit #301509 segmentation fault on 64bit architectures
FYI, this looks like it's due to some 64-bit brokenness in Cernlib (on
which mn-fit depends). The same problem appears on alpha and ia64. I
don't expect this to be solved for a long while, if ever; certa
Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture
> ---
>
> At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting
> team decided to release a version of sarge for amd64 which is based on the
> unpatched Debian
Hello Steve,
thank you for your quick reply to my amd64 bug list.
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> libmysqlclient-lgpl - Linuxthreads test has to be switched off for amd64
>
> I'm not going to give this a high priority, personally; all my reasons for
> adding this package in the first place have since
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> Packages from sarge with build problems on amd64
>
> There are still a few packages in sarge which fail to build from source
> on amd64. Those packages will not be part
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Since when are you following these issues ? and what experience do you have
> with how debian works ? And did you read Anthony's post on how this worked
> out.
Since 1998 I think, and I experienced first hand how difficult is to get
something through some
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:12:42PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Where are the minutes of the discussion, where are detailed explanation of
> > the
> > problems trying to be sovled ? Where is a call to alternative solution ?
> > Where
> >
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Where are the minutes of the discussion, where are detailed explanation of the
> problems trying to be sovled ? Where is a call to alternative solution ? Where
> is a call for help from the arch porters for security and infrastructure
> issues ? Given that
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:44:03PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yes, but the utherly arrogant and despreciating way in how this announcement
>
> Chill out. It was a RFC, and it was labelled as such. It may not be perfect,
> and obviously i
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Yes, but the utherly arrogant and despreciating way in how this announcement
Chill out. It was a RFC, and it was labelled as such. It may not be perfect,
and obviously it will see some (many?) changes yet. But it was NOT arrogant
or depreciating.
Some of
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:23:33PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Hello all,
> >
> > As promised earlier on -project[0], after the release team/ftpmaster
> > team meeting-of-minds last weekend, we have some news to share with the
> > rest of the p
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.13.0800 +0100]:
> I get your point, and I will tend to the RC bug as soon as somehow
> possible. Right now I am swamped, and I simply wanted to get a feel
> whether I am already in the crowd of those upholding the release, or
> whether I am j
also sprach Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.11.12.2312 +0100]:
> I'd always understood that bugs with a severity of 'serious' or
> above (also knows as Release Critical, or RC bugs) should always
> be treated with the highest priority, not just when near
> a release.
also sprach Bria
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:26:57PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I apologise if this is covered elsewhere, I am currently totally
> swamped and can't afford too much time for Debian.
>
> I am going to be away from my machine(s) starting 22 Nov until the
> middle of December. I currently have 1 R
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I apologise if this is covered elsewhere, I am currently totally
> swamped and can't afford too much time for Debian.
>
> I am going to be away from my machine(s) starting 22 Nov until the
> middle of December. I currently have 1 RC bug and several oth
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 21:26, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am going to be away from my machine(s) starting 22 Nov until the
> middle of December. I currently have 1 RC bug and several other bugs
> against my packages. If sarge's release will happen in 2003, I will
> bite the bullet and fix these bugs
37 matches
Mail list logo
