Re: rc bugs

2014-09-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Brian May writes ("rc bugs"): > Lets say there is a bug in a package X, however package X is still usable > by itself. > > However package Y depends on package X, and as a result of this bug it was > an RC bug. > > Is the bug against package X also RC? The question you are really asking, surely,

Re: rc bugs

2014-09-13 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2014-09-11, Brian May wrote: > My reading of the criteria is it depends on your interpretation of "makes > unrelated software on the system break". What does "unrelated" mean? In > this case it seems they are related as package Y depends on package X. Or > maybe it means "unrelated" as in gene

Re: rc bugs

2014-09-12 Thread Arto Jantunen
Brian May writes: > My reading of the criteria is it depends on your interpretation of "makes > unrelated software on the system break". What does "unrelated" mean? In > this case it seems they are related as package Y depends on package X. Or > maybe it means "unrelated" as in generated from dif

Re: rc bugs

2014-09-12 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Brian May wrote: > Lets say there is a bug in a package X, however package X is still usable > by itself. > > However package Y depends on package X, and as a result of this bug it was > an RC bug. > > Is the bug against package X also RC? A regression causing an RC bug

Re: RC bugs blocking transitions

2009-03-01 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adeodato Simó (01/03/2009): > Hello, o<, > We have a number of FTBFSes that are blockers for the current set of > transitions going forward. I've gone ahead and tagged them with > user:debian-rele...@lists.debian.org and usertag:transition-blocker. thanks for the heads-up. > The list is here:

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:40:03 +0200]: > The release team isn't proactively tracking those AFAIK Except that we... are. Thank you very much. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at de

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Thu Oct 23 12:53, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:40, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to > > -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug will have to be > > fixed through a testing-proposed

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/10/08 at 13:05 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is a list of RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer. If you want to > > reply to the list to comment on specific bugs, it's fine, but please Cc > > the bug reports

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Michael Meskes
> > Wouldn't it make sense to only send [TU] bugs as these are the bugs we have > > to > > fix for the release? [T] normaly means fix just waiting for migration, isn't > > it? > > No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to > -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a list of RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer. If you want to > reply to the list to comment on specific bugs, it's fine, but please Cc > the bug reports so the information you provide is also available on the > B

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:40, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No: in some cases, the maintainer forgot to send an unblock request to > -release@, or the fix was inappropriate, and the bug will have to be > fixed through a testing-proposed-updates upload. > > The release team isn't proa

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/10/08 at 10:21 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > The list can also be found on > > http://udd.debian.net/cgi-bin/lenny_rc_ddlist.cgi (generated on the fly > > from UDD). > > > > [T] means "affects only testing", [TU] means "aff

Re: RC bugs in lenny, sorted by maintainer

2008-10-23 Thread Michael Meskes
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 09:26:43AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > The list can also be found on > http://udd.debian.net/cgi-bin/lenny_rc_ddlist.cgi (generated on the fly > from UDD). > > [T] means "affects only testing", [TU] means "affects testing and > unstable". Wouldn't it make sense to only

Re: RC bugs with (seemingly) simple fixes

2007-01-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Likewise, #379113 has a patch and should be simple enough for someone > with a 64-bit system to test and upload. I'm home with my 64-bit system, so I'll get this one. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])