Re: postgresql and libssl - Bug#95146

2001-05-01 Thread Brian Ristuccia
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:13:49PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > I have to reiterate a query about what to do with postgresql in view of its > now being linked with libssl. > > Since this question is currently being referred to legal advice, do you > want me to move postgresql into non-us, which

Re: postgresql and libssl - Bug#95146

2001-05-01 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Petr" == Petr Cech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Since this question is currently being referred to legal >> advice, do you want me to move postgresql into non-us, which >> will force any packages depending on it into non-us too, or >> should I leave it alone pending resol

Re: postgresql and libssl - Bug#95146

2001-05-01 Thread Petr Cech
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:13:49PM +0100 , Oliver Elphick wrote: > I have to reiterate a query about what to do with postgresql in view of its > now being linked with libssl. don't do it > Since this question is currently being referred to legal advice, do you > want me to move postgresql into no

Re: postgresql and libssl - Bug#95146

2001-04-30 Thread PiotR
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:13:49PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > I have to reiterate a query about what to do with postgresql in view of its > now being linked with libssl. > > Since this question is currently being referred to legal advice, do you > want me to move postgresql into non-us, which