Re: package naming

2003-06-03 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:25:15PM +0200, Mario Lang wrote: > Sure, the epoch is of course necessary. What I am wondering about is how > katie will react if a source package is uploaded which produces a binary > package which is already produced by another source package. > > I.e., is there any t

Re: package naming

2003-06-03 Thread Mario Lang
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:15:19PM -0400, Deedra Waters wrote: > > > I've been working on the package "kernel-patch-speakup" which has a > > source package called speakup-cvs and produces the binary called > > kernel-patch-speakup_2002

Re: package naming

2003-06-03 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
Hi, On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:15:19PM -0400, Deedra Waters wrote: > I've been working on the package "kernel-patch-speakup" which has a > source package called speakup-cvs and produces the binary called > kernel-patch-speakup_20021221-1_all.deb, well, there is a stable > version of speakup t