On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:42:54AM -0500, Daniel Martin wrote:
>Speaking of which, where did netdate go? I've been wondering for a
>while what happened to it.
rdate may do what you are after.
Regards,
--
Brendan O'Deabod@compusol.com.au
Compusol Pty. Limi
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:42:54AM -0500, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Speaking of which, where did netdate go? I've been wondering for a
> while what happened to it.
It didn't actually have a license.
License problems: namely, there isn't one, and it's not clearly public
domain, and nobody knows who the author is.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> >
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> When upgrading to potato, tftpd functionality is lost because the new
> netstd only suggests it. And the parameters to tftpd have changed
> and the new package does not up
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:13:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:09:26AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >
> > Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> > When upgrading to potato, tftpd functionality is lost because the new
> > netstd only sug
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 01:09:26AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>
> Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> When upgrading to potato, tftpd functionality is lost because the new
> netstd only suggests it. And the parameters to tftpd have changed
> and the new packa
6 matches
Mail list logo
