Re: mawk(1) , gawk(1) and package control files (questions)

1995-11-21 Thread Chris Fearnley
'Bill Mitchell wrote:' > >The following are my best guesses at answers. If I guess wrong, >someone with better information will correct me. Thanks for the feedback. >Chris Fearnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [Deleted first part] >> o I'm not clear on the "provides" virtual package as it would ap

Re: mawk(1) , gawk(1) and package control files (questions)

1995-11-21 Thread Bill Mitchell
The following are my best guesses at answers. If I guess wrong, someone with better information will correct me. Chris Fearnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > [...] I have a few questions on this my first > debianization effort. > > o Why is gawk a required package? And is there any reason why g