On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:36:17AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> > You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
> > do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
> > only capable of storing messages in Maildir folders but also of
> > generating them. This
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:34:39AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello Debian-Developers,
>
> first, many thanks all of you for your great work. As I am not a pro, I am
> very glad that most of Debian works out-of-the-box.
>
> But, I was looking around and wondering about that I couldn't fin
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:19:35AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
>> do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
>> only capable of storing messages in Maildir fol
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > My logic was that, from the basic system, Maildir mailboxes are no
> > use.
>
> Can I have a bit of the weed you are smoking? Seems to be good.
They're pine needles. I really do need to get off them, they're keeping my
brain in the 70's...
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 08:19:35AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
> do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
> only capable of storing messages in Maildir folders but also of
> generating them. This i
Am Die, 2003-06-24 um 03.46 schrieb Matthew Palmer:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Now I'm wondering about it even more. IMHO `maildirmake' is _very_
> > necessary for any mail and as it seems to be only a 2-line-shell-script
> > why it isn't included anywhere and anyway in
* Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do.
> > > Why do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir
> > > is not only capable of storing messages in Maildir folders but
> > > also of generating them. This includes e.g.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:45:30AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
> > do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
> > only capable of storing messages in Ma
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 09:45:30AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
> > do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
> > only capable of storing messages in Ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 09:45 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do.
> > Why do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir
> > is not o
* Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
> do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir is not
> only capable of storing messages in Maildir folders but also of
> generating them. This includes e.g. the exim(4)
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:12:04PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> My logic was that, from the basic system, Maildir mailboxes are no
> use.
Can I have a bit of the weed you are smoking? Seems to be good.
Package: mutt
Priority: standard
`standard'
These packages pro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> But, I was looking around and wondering about that I couldn't find
> any `maildirmake' for Debian, excluding qmail-src, courier and
> maildrop, which I don't want/don't need to use.
[...]
You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do. Why
do we n
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, David B Harris wrote:
> Given how simple it is, makes more sense to have it in one place. I
> don't know where it should be (in all the MTAs?), but there you go :)
>
Well I have one in dovecot but I don't see why it couldn't be in e.g.
debianutils.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EM
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 13:12:04 +1000 (EST)
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Capable of handling, yes, but then, so is cat.Once delivered, though,
> there's no way of getting it back out again unless you're running something
> like courier or similar.
Or Mutt, or a halfdozen other MUAs
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 01:12:04PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, David B Harris wrote:
>
> > Exim is capable of handling Maildir mailboxes. It's Priority: important.
> > I don't know if that counts as "shipping it by default" or not, but I
> > would certainly say that it's th
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, David B Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:46:48 +1000 (EST)
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Now I'm wondering about it even more. IMHO `maildirmake' is _very_
> > > necessary for any mail and as it s
Thanks Matthew and David.
I think, it is a _strange_ discussion to use mbox or maildir and doesn't
lead to an one-and-only solution.
> Could you elaborate on your usage of maildirmake in this courier-less
situation?
I'm using getmail, which is able to deliver directly in maildir and mutt,
which c
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:46:48 +1000 (EST)
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Now I'm wondering about it even more. IMHO `maildirmake' is _very_
> > necessary for any mail and as it seems to be only a 2-line-shell-script
> > why it isn't i
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now I'm wondering about it even more. IMHO `maildirmake' is _very_
> necessary for any mail and as it seems to be only a 2-line-shell-script
> why it isn't included anywhere and anyway in the base-system?
As I recall, maildirmake is only needed if y
20 matches
Mail list logo
