Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > > > On 12/02/17 13:47, Simon McVittie wrote: > > Hi, thanks for thoughts! > > >> /lib/udev/??-mm-*.rules are probably of interest. ModemManager >> implements a whitelist (devices that are definitely modems), a blacklist >> (devices that are def

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 11:33:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: >> On 12/02/17 11:16, Bastien Roucaries wrote: >> > Last time braille stuff break (brick) a FPGA device with a jtag adaptator >> > (serial to jtag). So i really dislike package that

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Alec Leamas
On 12/02/17 13:47, Simon McVittie wrote: Hi, thanks for thoughts! /lib/udev/??-mm-*.rules are probably of interest. ModemManager implements a whitelist (devices that are definitely modems), a blacklist (devices that are definitely not modems), and a greylist (devices that might be modems, bu

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 11:33:22 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 12/02/17 11:16, Bastien Roucaries wrote: > > Last time braille stuff break (brick) a FPGA device with a jtag adaptator > > (serial to jtag). So i really dislike package that bind to all char device. > > > > Btw if you do this you need

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Alec Leamas
On 12/02/17 11:16, Bastien Roucaries wrote: Last time braille stuff break (brick) a FPGA device with a jtag adaptator (serial to jtag). So i really dislike package that bind to all char device. > > Btw if you do this you need a break on braille stuff... Now, we are not talking about all

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-12 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Le 11 février 2017 11:46:14 GMT+01:00, Alec Leamas a écrit : > > >On 11/02/17 10:29, Bastien Roucaries wrote: >> Le 10 février 2017 16:13:15 GMT+01:00, Alec Leamas > a écrit : >>> Dear list, >[cut] >>> Proposed /dev/ permissions after installing lirc: >>> >>> - The /dev/lirc? devices are set us

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-11 Thread Alec Leamas
On 11/02/17 10:29, Bastien Roucaries wrote: Le 10 février 2017 16:13:15 GMT+01:00, Alec Leamas a écrit : Dear list, [cut] Proposed /dev/ permissions after installing lirc: - The /dev/lirc? devices are set user:group lirc:lirc and mode 660 (udev rule). - The lirc user is added to the inpu

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-11 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Le 10 février 2017 16:13:15 GMT+01:00, Alec Leamas a écrit : >Dear list, > >After some work it seems that an updated LIRC package has landed in >stretch without any major problems. This resolves the urgent need to >update it to something recent enough to be supported by upstream. > >One remai

Re: lircd daemon as regular user => device access problems

2017-02-10 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:13 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > Thoughts? Your post reminds me of the uaccess and AppStream items here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2016/11/msg8.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise