On Dec 20, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > The problem is in the other direction: new binaries reference
> > sym...@libfoo_1.0, so even if they work the old library the dynamic
> > linker outputs a warning at startup.
> Which is why Steve talked of a shlibdeps bump, which would cover this,
> since the
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:17:12 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 20, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > How can I write an ld linker script that will cause ld to output the
> > > same symbols two times, with and without a version tag?
> > > I.e. I need it to output both sym...@base and sym...@lib
On Dec 20, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > How can I write an ld linker script that will cause ld to output the
> > same symbols two times, with and without a version tag?
> > I.e. I need it to output both sym...@base and sym...@libfoo_1.0.
> In what sense does this make it backward-incompatible? A s
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:56:06AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> How can I write an ld linker script that will cause ld to output the
> same symbols two times, with and without a version tag?
> I.e. I need it to output both sym...@base and sym...@libfoo_1.0.
> The final goal is to fix a library whi
4 matches
Mail list logo
