On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:21:34PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:10:58PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > Don't worry :) If new 0.6.0 upstream source will change the soname and the
> > package is named to libatlas-cpp-0.7 then you can just conflicts/replaces
> > to
>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:10:58PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wednesday 30 November 2005 22:00, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > > Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But even for
> > > libatlas-cpp-
Hi Michael,
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 22:00, Michael Koch wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But even for
> > libatlas-cpp-0.6 there was a soname change (if you see this bugreport
> > about the rename
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But even for
> libatlas-cpp-0.6 there was a soname change (if you see this bugreport about
> the rename of libatlas-cpp-0.5) and there was no need to rename
> libatlas-cpp-0.6 be
Hi Steve,
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 12:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:38:32AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > > I don't see any reason to rename the -dbg packages, generally.
> >
> > For the first cxx transition during Breezy development, I renamed
> > libatlas-cpp-0.5
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:38:32AM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Hi Ming, Steve, others,
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 11:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:09:00AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > * Renam
Hi Ming, Steve, others,
I did the merge and rename of this library package, so I think I should answer
as well:
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 11:03, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:09:00AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:09:00AM -0600, Ming Hua wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > * Rename and rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for
> >these packages should be in any case "c2a" (instead of "c2"). No
> >new suffix is needed w
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:28:05AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> * Rename and rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for
>these packages should be in any case "c2a" (instead of "c2"). No
>new suffix is needed when the soname changes in a new upstream
>upload.
I noticed
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The proposal by upstream is to configure libstdc++ to use the new
> allocator again (the default one).
I've noticed that with recent updates, I'm suddenly getting tons of
undefined function errors resulting from STL-related template
instantiation. [I'v
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:02:21AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Given that anyone with wanna-build access for an arch can fire off a binNMU,
> I don't know if it's feasible to provide a comprehensive list; but I've
> already been asked about keeping the amd64 maintainers in the loop, so I can
> c
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 07:34:58PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > * Once dependencies are fulfilled for all architectures, request
> > binNMU's for all other packages depending on a library package with
> > a changed package name.
> > If a source upload is necessa
Matthias Klose a écrit :
* Once dependencies are fulfilled for all architectures, request
binNMU's for all other packages depending on a library package with
a changed package name.
If a source upload is necessary for other fixes, wait as well until
dependencies are fulfilled for all
On 12:14 Mon 14 Nov 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> [Sent to d-d-a as well, didn't arrive there yet]
Did you actually sign the mail to d-d-a?
Quoting http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/:
Only messages signed by a Debian developer will be accepted by this
list.
Cheers,
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
