Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Or see and follow the instructions summarised on
> > http://master.debian.org/~joey/misc/webwml.html#ddp
> >
> > > PS: If you are in rush, I or javi should be able to add you as a pserver
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 10:46:27PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi Joey
>
> > >
> > > Just request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] while pointing them our message on
> > > this list.
> >
> > Or see and follow the instructions summarised on
> > http://master.debian.org/~joey/misc/webwml.html#ddp
>
>
>
Hi Joey
> >
> > Just request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] while pointing them our message on
> > this list.
>
> Or see and follow the instructions summarised on
> http://master.debian.org/~joey/misc/webwml.html#ddp
According to the page you pointed to, it seems to tell me
that I should send request t
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 06:24:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Or see and follow the instructions summarised on
> http://master.debian.org/~joey/misc/webwml.html#ddp
>
> > PS: If you are in rush, I or javi should be able to add you as a pserver
> > access user just like othe
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Please get it. Having DOC in CVS makes easier for proofreader to
> correct things. For me, I initially got patches. But after a while, I
> developed mutual trust with few people. They start fixing it with write
> access sometimes later. But they always ask significant chang
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:05:14PM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:03:23PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > 3. can I get commit-access to CVS?
Please get it. Having DOC in CVS makes easier for proofreader to
correct things. For me, I initially got patche
Hi,
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sat, Jan 29, 2005:
> What I'm saying is that -- in the same way that some people insist on
> Debian Policy to be followed blindly -- there are already some people
> insisting that this document be followed blindly. "Raising" the status
>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:20:25PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I haven't read the document in question in a rather long time, so
> > I can't actually object (on some sort of serious basis, I mean),
> > but I would nevertheless request that the document be handed to
> > the -english ma
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:03:23PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I need three things
>
> 1. Is result of DDP packaged in Debian as a batch?
No (but could be done :-)
> 2. does it support docbook sgml/xml?
CVS supports anything, automatic builds do support Docbook (you have sample
Xml Makefile
Hi,
I seem to have lost the mail I tried to send last time, rewriting.
> Could you please consider contributing this to the DDP and adding it to the
> DDP CVS? I'd rather not have Debian Documentation in all sort of different
> places, specially documentation written by DDs. And the DDP is the
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 02:54:07AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I was kind of waiting for inclusion into the developers reference,
> but the text format is different.
>
> libpkg-guide is written in docbook XML while
> developers reference is written in DebianDoc SGML.
Could you please conside
> I haven't read the document in question in a rather long time, so I
> can't actually object (on some sort of serious basis, I mean), but I
> would nevertheless request that the document be handed to the -english
> mailing list for proofreading *before* it's uploaded as a package and
> that
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:37:18PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> IIRC there were some people who objected to some of the contents of
> the document. But even for those it is probably better to have a
> Debian package - if it's important, the discussion will take place in
> bug reports, instead
Junichi Uekawa writes,
> Considering that enough people seem to be feeling the
> itch for libpkg-guide package, and since I would
> consider using the BTS etc. for revision management
> of libpkg-guide, I might go around packaging it as a
> Debian package.
I had meant politely to ask you to pack
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Considering that enough people seem to be feeling the
> itch for libpkg-guide package, and since I would
> consider using the BTS etc. for revision management
> of libpkg-guide, I might go around packaging it as a
> Debian package.
>
>
> Any objections?
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, Jan 26, 2005:
>
> > It is already linked from deveopers reference.
>
> It would be nice to have a package for this guide, for example to
> request fixes and to make something official out of it.
>
> The author seems to be Junichi Uekawa, dancer at
Hi,
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Wed, Jan 26, 2005:
> It is already linked from deveopers reference.
It would be nice to have a package for this guide, for example to
request fixes and to make something official out of it.
The author seems to be Junichi Uekawa, dancer at deb
On 2005-01-26 Pierre Ancelot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone, i would point to this link :
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
[...]
It is already linked from deveopers reference.
cu andreas
PS: It is pretty useless to sign messages witho
18 matches
Mail list logo
