* Paul Wise [05 19:00 +0800]:
[...]
> For Debian there are only disadvantages to inlined popt in most cases.
Thanks for all your advises. I'll take care of them by packaging a
new version of moc build against libpopt-dev.
Elimar
--
Alles was viel bedacht wird ist bedenklich!;-)
Hiya,
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 07:00:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> > we have many packages which are build against popt. Some of them
> > have included a bundled (inlined) verion of popt. But they are using
> > Debian's libopt-dev like
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Thanks for any suggestions
I forgot to say: if you are contacting upstreams, please include this URL:
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ.
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> we have many packages which are build against popt. Some of them
> have included a bundled (inlined) verion of popt. But they are using
> Debian's libopt-dev like pkg-config.
Sounds like a bunch of bugs to be filed and info to be added t
4 matches
Mail list logo
