Re: libpng transition

2002-01-04 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 10:32:22AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 04 Jan 2002, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:27:00PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > Another way is to bump the soname on libL at the time you bump the one > > > on libM. People are

Re: libpng transition

2002-01-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 04 Jan 2002, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:27:00PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Another way is to bump the soname on libL at the time you bump the one > > on libM. People are usually against this, since in fact the libL > > interface hasn't changed at all. I'

Re: libpng transition

2002-01-04 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 09:27:00PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > "Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If we go this route, how do we gracefully handle a bump in > > SONAME for libM? > We have no way. We have an ungraceful way, however: create a flag > day, when all the relev

Re: libpng transition

2002-01-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we go this route, how do we gracefully handle a bump in > SONAME for libM? We have no way. We have an ungraceful way, however: create a flag day, when all the relevant applications need to be recompiled. Another way is to bump the soname on