Re: libcrypto++

2005-07-25 Thread Jens Peter Secher
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's another problem with libtool: > > [...] > ./libtool: line 4120: test: : integer expression expected > ./libtool: line 4120: test: : integer expression expected > creating reloadable object files... > ./libtool: line 4154: test: : integer express

Re: libcrypto++

2005-07-24 Thread Florian Weimer
* Jens Peter Secher: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Below is a list of libraries which appear to be blocking other packages that >> need to go through the C++ transition[1] and which are themselves ready to >> go through the ABI transition. > [...] >> libcrypto++ > > I am fighti

Re: libcrypto++

2005-07-24 Thread Florian Weimer
* Florian Weimer: > * Nathanael Nerode: > >> I'd be interested in working on tracking down the linking problems, but I >> don't want to duplicate your work. Are your patches-so-far available >> somewhere? > > I think I've found the linking bug. Details later. The link problem is caused by cod

Re: libcrypto++

2005-07-23 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nathanael Nerode: > I'd be interested in working on tracking down the linking problems, but I > don't want to duplicate your work. Are your patches-so-far available > somewhere? I think I've found the linking bug. Details later. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

2005-07-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I am loosing. This is an exceedingly nasty library. There is way too much templatization in this library, and GCC spews warnings like there's no tomorrow. I'd be interested in working on tracking down the linking problems, but

Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

2005-07-23 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:33:28AM +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > GCC4 does definitely not like a mix of templates and anonymous enums > [1,2] but there are easy fixes for this. [1] clearly stats this as illegal according to the C++ standard. > What is worse, it seems that GCC4 silently refuse

Re: libcrypto++ (Was: NMUs wanted: C++ library packages in need of uploading)

2005-07-22 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 01:33 +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I am loosing. > > GCC4 does definitely not like a mix of templates and anonymous enums > [1,2] but there are easy fixes for this. > > What is worse, it seems that GCC4 silently refuses to gen