Re: heimdal and ldap

2007-02-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ> A backward compatibility symlink seems like a reasonable > Russ> idea to me. Is that already what was proposed in the bug? > Russ> (I'm vaguely ancillarily involved in OpenLDAP pack

Re: heimdal and ldap

2007-02-27 Thread Brian May
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russ> A backward compatibility symlink seems like a reasonable Russ> idea to me. Is that already what was proposed in the bug? Russ> (I'm vaguely ancillarily involved in OpenLDAP packaging but Russ> am not really a core memb

Re: heimdal and ldap

2007-02-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ> Correct. This is because the new version of OpenLDAP cannot > Russ> be linked against GnuTLS (our local patch is already > Russ> problematic in 2.1 and broke in later versions), so

Re: heimdal and ldap

2007-02-27 Thread Brian May
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russ> Correct. This is because the new version of OpenLDAP cannot Russ> be linked against GnuTLS (our local patch is already Russ> problematic in 2.1 and broke in later versions), so it can Russ> only build with OpenSSL, and

Re: heimdal and ldap

2007-02-26 Thread Russ Allbery
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a bug in heimdal-kdc: > http://bugs.debian.org/385809 > That is caused because Heimdal is linked against an old version of > libldap, and the new version changes the location of the socket > path. However as far as I can tell, it is not possible to