Re: gnome-1 transition

2005-10-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oh!, the irony. > > (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01242.html >http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01246.html) Unlike Joey Hess, I did not say that people who wait for the bug report are remiss or being bad people.

Re: gnome-1 transition

2005-10-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> A few weeks ago, libpng10-0 was removed from the archive. A >> consequence of this was that all gnome-1 packages (and there are a >> number still around) instantly became FTBFS. > > (s/FTBFS/uninstallab

Re: gnome-1 transition

2005-10-07 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Thomas Bushnell BSG [Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:53:34 -0700]: > Please recompile and upload packages which you maintain as these > versions become available on the arch you use for development work. > When you have recompiled, please *check* to make sure that the only > libpng linked into your package

Re: gnome-1 transition

2005-10-07 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:00:44PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: >> A few weeks ago, libpng10-0 was removed from the archive. A >> consequence of this was that all gnome-1 packages (and there are a >> number still around) instantly became FTBFS. > (

Re: gnome-1 transition

2005-10-07 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi, On Thu, Oct 06, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > A few weeks ago, libpng10-0 was removed from the archive. A > consequence of this was that all gnome-1 packages (and there are a > number still around) instantly became FTBFS. (s/FTBFS/uninstallable?) > Packages which link against