Re: future of Debian amavisd-milter package

Paul Gevers writes ("Re: future of Debian amavisd-milter package"): > On 08-12-16 23:24, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > Although I'm not a user of that package, I consider removing it from > > stretch the wrong thing to do. > > Opinions differ. I raised the

Re: future of Debian amavisd-milter package

Hi On 08-12-16 23:24, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Although I'm not a user of that package, I consider removing it from > stretch the wrong thing to do. Opinions differ. I raised the issue of removing more packages from Debian a while ago and got different responses.¹ If nobody is maintaining such a

Re: future of Debian amavisd-milter package

har...@a-little-linux-box.at wrote... > While it would theoretically also be possible to file a RFA or O bug I > currently do not consider this a good course of action: The number of QA > packages is already very high and while adopting amavisd-milter would be > not so much of a problem to maintai