On 7/4/05, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>
> > True. But for example, is the current apt-get capable of contacting
> > another mirror if and only if the primary fails?
>
> For package downloads apt will try the sources i
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> True. But for example, is the current apt-get capable of contacting
> another mirror if and only if the primary fails?
For package downloads apt will try the sources in the order listed in
sources.list, only trying subsequent on
On 7/4/05, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not sure how exactly the current mirrors work, but syncing
> > (primary) mirrors between eachother instead of all from a master may
> > be an idea.
>
> Mirrors are stacked in a tree (
Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/22/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> [Olaf van der Spek]
>> > I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
>> > (more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
>> > load on central s
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:14:44PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:05:25PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > It was sent right after the hosting died.
> > Should he sent "The hosting may die somewhere in the future, please
> > offer something just in case we need it"?
>
> well
On 6/26/05, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10332 March 1977, sean finney wrote:
>
> >> I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
> >> come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
> > sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but..
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 06:05:25PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> It was sent right after the hosting died.
> Should he sent "The hosting may die somewhere in the future, please
> offer something just in case we need it"?
well, i guess i don't know the details of the situation, but i would
hope tha
On 10332 March 1977, sean finney wrote:
>> I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
>> come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
> sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but...
> why wasn't this brought up *before* it was brought to an en
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 07:22:29PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:25:12AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
> > come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
> sorry to be a stick in th
hi,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 09:25:12AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> I'm sorry to say that Debian's hosting of machines at Above.Net has
> come to an end. Michael Shields and Steve Osborn have hosted critical
sorry to be a stick in the mud about this, but...
why wasn't this brought up *before* it
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 20.02, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
[debian infrastructure]
> I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
> (more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
> load on central servers?
You said it yourself: in the long term.
I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Frost wrote:
:: Based on the requirements it seems unlikely Debian
:: would be able to afford to pay for hosting very
:: long with our current donation income amounts.
:: Gigabit network connections and associated rack space
:: is cheaper than
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunatly the CCCP is currently maxed out on power in its existing
> racks, so is not taking new clients, unless one moves.
Is this true for its "sister sites" too? The web page says they have
sites in Seattle, Chicago, Toronto, and Washington.
Thomas
On 6/22/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Olaf van der Spek]
> > I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
> > (more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
> > load on central servers?
>
> Please give some specific examples of wha
[Olaf van der Spek]
> I've been wondering, would it be an idea (for the long-term) to use
> (more) distributed ... or p2p concepts to reduce the dependency and
> load on central servers?
Please give some specific examples of what you mean.
Debian services are already distributed across a wide ra
On 6/22/05, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If you think you could offer hosting under these conditions, please
> > send details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
> already
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
> already been considered and rejected). We could perhaps take
> advantage of the California Community Colocation Project, which offers
> free colocation for non-profits and individuals.
Unfortunat
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 11:43:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > "Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> >>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hostin
[Jonas Meurer]
> paying for any parts of infrastructure would delete the independance
> from donations. debian was never depending on any donations, for
> good reasons. if we change this, the next step will be that some
> monstrous companies offer deals to us: "We give you money, you give
> us XY
On 22/06/2005 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> > o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>
> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
> and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for critic
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > I think the point is that we ask for a donation before we spend money
> > on it.
>
> Sure, but the statement quoted above rules it out entirely. "can't pay" is
> pretty definitive. I'm wonder
On Wed, June 22, 2005 11:36, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> "Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
>>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>>
>> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary d
"Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
>> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
>
> I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
> and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying fo
On Wed, June 22, 2005 10:25, James Troup wrote:
> o be a donation, i.e. gratis. Debian can't pay for it's own hosting.
I was wondering about this statement. Debian receives monetary donations
and owns quite a lot of money - wouldn't paying for critical parts of
infrastructure like ftpmaster be mo
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you think you could offer hosting under these conditions, please
> send details to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can't offer hosting, but I do have a suggestion (though perhaps it's
already been considered and rejected). We could perhaps take
advantage of the C
25 matches
Mail list logo
