Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> For usability: I imagine what is typically needed is the set of Vcs-Git
> fields somewhere conveniently machine-readable, so one could just go
>
> apt-get source --git whatever
>
> and get a checkout of its packaging repository.
... which is what debcheckout provi
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
>> 1) Think about doing this for linux-2.6, XOrg or OOo and what it would
>> mean for the source size or usability.
>
> Indeed, the history is pretty large. A rough estimate (for something
> less rough, one should use a well packed bundle w
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> 1) Think about doing this for linux-2.6, XOrg or OOo and what it would
> mean for the source size or usability.
Indeed, the history is pretty large. A rough estimate (for something
less rough, one should use a well packed bundle with only the objects
of interest):
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
>> Given the size of the .git dir when you're not using something like stgit
>> and have all objects properly packed, one could even consider shipping .git
>> inside the package if it is small enough.
>>
>> Is that a proper way to do
4 matches
Mail list logo
