Hey Guillem,
Guillem Jover [2014-08-14 13:05 +0200]:
> Good. :) At the end I went for warning and removing the autopkgtest
> value if the file is missing, as that seemed to make more sense, but we
> can certainly revisit that if there's advantages in keeping the value.
Splendid!
> It migth make
Hi!
On Tue, 2014-07-08 at 11:22:57 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:06:14AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > How will it handle an existing value in that field? In the future, we
> > > might have other forms of test suite, thus requiring different items in
> > > the Tes
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:06:14AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > How will it handle an existing value in that field? In the future, we
> > might have other forms of test suite, thus requiring different items in
> > the Testsuite: field. What happens when there is already
> >
> > Testsuite: fo
Hi!
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 13:19:41 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 06:35:47PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Reading the spec [S], it seems to me that the file can be empty, as it
> > states “This is a file containing zero or more RFC822-style stanzas”,
> > so the code ca
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 06:35:47PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Given that dpkg-dev has recognized the Testsuite field for some time,
> I don't really see a reason for dpkg-source not to automatically add
> it to the generated .dsc with an “autopkgtest” value if there is a
> debian/tests/
Hey Guillem,
Guillem Jover [2014-07-06 18:35 +0200]:
> Given that dpkg-dev has recognized the Testsuite field for some time,
> I don't really see a reason for dpkg-source not to automatically add
> it to the generated .dsc with an “autopkgtest” value if there is a
> debian/tests/control file aroun
6 matches
Mail list logo
