Sam Hartman writes:
> However, I cannot read that text to imply anything about what happens if
> the Debian revision is present:
> * Policy seems silent on whether the software MAY?SHOULD NOT/MUST NOT be
> written explicitly for Debian (I consider this a feature)
> * Policy appears silent abo
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
>> Citation requested. I looked for this today and couldn't find
>> it.
Russ> Policy lacks a section that clearly defines native and
Russ> non-native packages, which is a long-standing bug in Policy.
Russ> Currently, that information is i
> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Ian Jackson writes:
>> Secondly, there doesn't appear to be any support in policy for
>> this restriction.
Russ> Policy definitely supports this restriction, as Guillem
Russ> pointed out. I want to echo that analysis as one of the
Sam Hartman writes:
>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
> Russ> Ian Jackson writes:
> >> Secondly, there doesn't appear to be any support in policy for
> >> this restriction.
> Russ> Policy definitely supports this restriction, as Guillem
> Russ> pointed out. I want to e
Ian Jackson writes:
> Secondly, there doesn't appear to be any support in policy for this
> restriction.
Policy definitely supports this restriction, as Guillem pointed out. I
want to echo that analysis as one of the people to have touched that
portion of the Policy document.
I have always con
5 matches
Mail list logo
