On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote:
I can take it if nobody wants since I use it (not too active, but) and
have goot contact with the current upstream maintainer.
But I do not like to ask people (to sponsor the package this case), so
it's better if there is somebody else.
If you are fai
On 12/5/06, Helmut Wollmersdorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hijacking the package?
My packaging skills are too poor.
I can take it if nobody wants since I use it (not too active, but) and
have goot contact with the current upstream maintainer.
But I do not like to ask
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
My packaging skills are too poor.
...
In my case, www.nomen.at has 133 languages at the moment, and I need some
minor multibyte/UTF-8 improvements of the last upstream versions. At least I
will have to compile it myself after waiting another few
Andreas Tille wrote:
Hijacking the package?
My packaging skills are too poor.
I have to admit that dict support is kind of weak inside
Debian.
But for dict_d_ it's worse.
There seemed to be no interest in dict-wn
wn is a nice thing and IMHO underestimated. But in the case of wn I
my
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
What are the usual possibilities to solve this problem?
Hijacking the package?
I have to admit that dict support is kind of weak inside
Debian. I decided to drop the dict-wn package for reasons
I explained in
http://lists.debian.org/debian
5 matches
Mail list logo
