Re: dh_shlibdeps and -dbg packages

2008-01-17 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 23:58 +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:50:09PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hm, dh_shlibdeps prunes /usr/lib/debug when looking for ELF executables. > > > This was apparently done when adding support for spl

Re: dh_shlibdeps and -dbg packages

2008-01-17 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 02:50:09PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hm, dh_shlibdeps prunes /usr/lib/debug when looking for ELF executables. > > This was apparently done when adding support for split debugging symbols > > files: see #215670. > > > > This looks

Re: dh_shlibdeps and -dbg packages

2008-01-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hm, dh_shlibdeps prunes /usr/lib/debug when looking for ELF executables. > This was apparently done when adding support for split debugging symbols > files: see #215670. > > This looks like a bug to me, since /usr/lib/debug is used for "real" > unstripped li

Re: dh_shlibdeps and -dbg packages

2008-01-17 Thread Niko Tyni
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 07:03:43PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > A lot of these seem to be -dbg packages and I've got a few issues with > that. Even if I add ${shlibs:Depends} for the -dbg package and run > dh_makeshlibs and dh_shlibdeps, I get this warning with dh_gencontrol > for the -dpkg packa