Hi all,
The new style dbconfig-common packages live already for some time in the
archive, and I haven't received any complaint/bug yet about the database
dependent packages. This means that I believe it is time to bug the
maintainers of packages that depend on dbconfig-common with a wish list
bug
Excerpts from The Wanderer's message of 2016-01-30 15:49:51 -0800:
> On 2016-01-30 at 08:49, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> > Excerpts from The Wanderer's message of 2016-01-30 04:28:42 -0800:
> >
> >> On 2016-01-30 at 04:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> >>> Actually, I don't think that is in scope of dbconfi
On 2016-01-30 at 08:49, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from The Wanderer's message of 2016-01-30 04:28:42 -0800:
>
>> On 2016-01-30 at 04:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Actually, I don't think that is in scope of dbconfig-common. I
>>> would rather expect that MariaDB would provide that
>>> functiona
Excerpts from The Wanderer's message of 2016-01-30 04:28:42 -0800:
> On 2016-01-30 at 04:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > Hi Frederic-Emmanuel,
> >
> > On 30-01-16 09:30, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
>
> >> Do you know if dbconfig-common will integrate a way to switch from
> >> mysql to mariadb in
Hi,
On 30-01-16 12:30, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
>> If a package relies on the dbconfig-common framework for database setup
>> and maintenance, installing dbconfig-no-thanks instead of one of
>> dbconfig's database-specific packages will block this function. It is
>> intended for cases where
On 2016-01-30 at 04:51, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Frederic-Emmanuel,
>
> On 30-01-16 09:30, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
>> Do you know if dbconfig-common will integrate a way to switch from
>> mysql to mariadb in the near futur. something whcih can help do the
>> migration database from mysql t
Hi Frederic-Emmanuel,
On 30-01-16 09:30, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> I am the maintainer of tango-db which use dbconfig-common and a mysql
> database.
> It seems that there is currently a discussion about he support of mysql and
> mariadb for Debian 9
Can you please point me to the relevan
Hi all,
On 06-12-15 14:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
> For those of you that backport their packages via the Debian backports
> archive, I will provide a backport of dbconfig-common once version 2.0.0
> reaches testing.
This has happened. dbconfig-common, dbconfig- and
dbconfig-no-thanks are now in sid,
Hi Zigo,
On 10-12-15 01:12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Now, what should I do if my packages support all types of db currently
> supported by dbconfig-common (ie: sqlite, mysql and postgress)?
Wasn't my example in the first e-mail clear? I would expect:
Depends: dbconfig-sqlite | dbconfig-sqlite3 | d
On 12/06/2015 06:22 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Paul Gevers's message of 2015-12-06 05:23:07 -0800:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> TL;DR;1 if your package depends on dbconfig-common please update your
>> dependencies when my version 2.0.0 hits the archive (I expect in two
>> weeks).
>> TL;DR;2 should
On 12/06/2015 02:23 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> As a bonus, I can now add the database server packages to recommends,
> which should make life of the less experienced user easier. Do you think
> I should do this, or should I leave the database server package at the
> suggests level?
Please don't put
Mathias Behrle dijo [Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:16:38AM +0100]:
> Some questions for Tryton server:
>
> The situation is
>
> - Tryton server runs out of the box without configuration with a SQLite
> database
> - The (strongly) recommended database is PostgreSQL, but there is also support
> for M
Le 08/12/2015 20:14, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On 08-12-15 09:49, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> When local configuration does not work or when local databases cannot
>> be reached or when local database server packages are not installed
>> the priority of dbconfig-common question about r
Le 08/12/2015 20:25, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> I assume you don't like the dbconfig-pgsql | dbconfig-mysql |
> dbconfig-no-thanks dependency alternatives? By default the user will
> then get pgsql.
Not if the user has dbconfig-mysql or dbconfig-no-thanks already
installed (probably due to other pack
Hi Mathias,
On 08-12-15 10:16, Mathias Behrle wrote:
> Would it be possible for the last point to skip completely the database
> configuration (e.g. dbconfig* not jumping in at all, when tryton-neso pulls in
> tryton-server)?
I believe this is something that you would need to implement inside the
Hi Vincent,
On 08-12-15 09:49, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> When local configuration does not work or when local databases cannot
> be reached or when local database server packages are not installed
> the priority of dbconfig-common question about remote database should
> be modified so that the user
* Paul Gevers: " dbconfig-common: near future change in dependency stack" (Sun,
06 Dec 2015 14:23:07 +0100):
Hi Paul,
> TL;DR;1 if your package depends on dbconfig-common please update your
> dependencies when my version 2.0.0 hits the archive (I expect in two
> weeks).
> TL;DR;2 should the new
Le 06/12/2015 20:48, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> I am totally flabbergasted. dbconfig-common goes through a lot of hoops
> just to make sure this is not true. Sure, the *default* questions and
> answers are geared towards local database servers. But by either
> (re-)configuring dbconfig-common to raise
Excerpts from Paul Gevers's message of 2015-12-06 11:48:41 -0800:
> Hi Clint,
>
> On 06-12-15 18:22, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > I've never been very happy with
> > dbconfig-common because it kind of assumes databases are on the same
> > server as apps, which is increasingly not the case with smaller s
Hi Clint,
On 06-12-15 18:22, Clint Byrum wrote:
> I've never been very happy with
> dbconfig-common because it kind of assumes databases are on the same
> server as apps, which is increasingly not the case with smaller server
> instances running in VMs, on the cloud and in containers.
I am totall
❦ 6 décembre 2015 14:23 +0100, Paul Gevers :
> TL;DR;2 should the new dbconfig- packages recommend or suggest
> the database server packages?
Suggest.
Otherwise, your plan looks just fine.
--
All generalizations are false, including this one.
-- Mark Twain
signature.asc
Des
Excerpts from Paul Gevers's message of 2015-12-06 05:23:07 -0800:
> Hi all,
>
> TL;DR;1 if your package depends on dbconfig-common please update your
> dependencies when my version 2.0.0 hits the archive (I expect in two
> weeks).
> TL;DR;2 should the new dbconfig- packages recommend or suggest
>
22 matches
Mail list logo
