On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 06:11:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 09:26:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > i am always not sure, wether my system is OK. :) sometimes it might be
> > useful to do a new installation (no update) only because then much of the
> > old unn
Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> That's the reason why I would like to see a
>
> dpkg --{remove,add}-files [--package ]
>
> option to dpkg. I think it's simple to implement to the package .list file> and can ease the task for securing local files
> from dpkg in addition
> to help checking the system.
On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 06:11:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
[...]
>
> In particular, it checks that all the files listed as alternatives, as
> diversions and in the dpkg database itself are all present and accounted
> for, and produces a list of things that weren't listed but are still on
> you
On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 06:11:25PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> If you're running a hamm (Debian 2.0, frozen) you might like to look at
> cruft (cruft_0.9.4_i386.deb, still sitting in Incoming; try
> ftp1.us.debian.org:/pub/debian/Incoming
> or your favourite Incoming mirror) which does s
On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 09:26:24AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hm. after updating some packages i found out that old directories still
> exist. (the older packages didn't clean themselves the right way)
> should there be a possibility to do something like
> dpkg --overall-consistency-check
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
