Christian Seiler wrote...
> tl;dr: I don't think compression modules will increase boot times
> on HDDs in any significant manner, but it may be a good idea to
> support that just to reduce the amount of space required on disk.
Well, sometimes I remember I was shocked to learn in the MBR partitio
On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 13:29:00 +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>I volunteer as test subject for that experiment. I would appreciate even
>small steps, considering the current laptop in front of me with average
>magnetic HDD. Over a minute boot time, which is insane and IMHO mostly
>caused by the storm of
On 12/29/2016 11:47 PM, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Eduard Bloch wrote...
>
>> I volunteer as test subject for that experiment. I would appreciate even
>> small steps, considering the current laptop in front of me with average
>> magnetic HDD. Over a minute boot time, which is insane and IMHO mostly
Eduard Bloch wrote...
> I volunteer as test subject for that experiment. I would appreciate even
> small steps, considering the current laptop in front of me with average
> magnetic HDD. Over a minute boot time, which is insane and IMHO mostly
> caused by the storm of IO operations required nowada
Hallo,
* Josh Triplett [Sun, Dec 25 2016, 07:59:18PM]:
> Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > Do we want it or not?
> > And if we do, should we support gzip, XZ or both?
> >
> > From time to time some user requests enabling this feature, but since
> > Debian kernels do not use it I am not sure that it is a go
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Do we want it or not?
> And if we do, should we support gzip, XZ or both?
>
> From time to time some user requests enabling this feature, but since
> Debian kernels do not use it I am not sure that it is a good idea to add
> one or two library dependencies to kmod.
Does it
6 matches
Mail list logo
