On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 12:17:48AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> my concern is, that a timely uploaded python-gnome package wanting to
> be built with libfoo-dev/libfoo2 get's built by an autobuilder which
> has libfoo-dev/libfoo1 available (the python-gnome source gets built
> before the new li
Ben Collins writes:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:15:07PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:02PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > binary of the newest package of each build dep available in unstable
> > > > before building the package. If that is not the case I wou
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 05:32:13PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Most people feel that not keeping older soname libs around for a certain
> period is a bad idea, just for this reason. You as the package builder
> shouldn't have to worry about it.
Okay, thanks!
cu
Torsten
pgp1j3ZQuywdc.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:15:07PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:02PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > binary of the newest package of each build dep available in unstable
> > > before building the package. If that is not the case I would have to
> > > depend on
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:05:02PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > binary of the newest package of each build dep available in unstable
> > before building the package. If that is not the case I would have to
> > depend on at least the library version installed on my system it seems.
>
> If the bu
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 09:38:00PM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> I got a bug report on python-gnome because a) I did not yet conform to the
> new python policy (missed the dep, thanks Matthias), and b) I did not
> depend on at least 1.0.0 of libgtkhtml-dev.
>
> Now I am wonderin
> "me" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
me> This makes it rather difficult to build a chroot testing
me> environment that makes sense :/
Nevermind.
apt-get install build-essential dpkg-dev
gets round my problem.
--
Stephen
"If I claimed I was emporer just caus
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # apt-get source --compile gri
>
> Or have I missed something?
What is still missing is
apt-get --compile dist-upgrade
That should download all sources (in the correct order) build them,
move the debs to its cache and install.
May the Source be
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> bug1 wrote:
>
> > It would be cool if packages had better support for build dependencies
> > so its easier/more reliable to build from source.
>
> Something like this?
>
> Source: gri
> Section: math
> Priority: optional
> Maintainer: Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTE
bug1 wrote:
> It would be cool if packages had better support for build dependencies
> so its easier/more reliable to build from source.
Something like this?
Source: gri
Section: math
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: debhelper, netcdfg-dev, tet
On 2817T040155+1000, bug1 wrote:
> It would be cool if packages had better support for build dependencies
> so its easier/more reliable to build from source.
Specifically?
> There would probably have to be a set of source base packages defined
> somewhere that are required as a base for build
11 matches
Mail list logo
