Hello Mike,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:02:38PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> Done. Also, adjacent packages in the dependency graph which are part of
> the same source package do not increase the "level" a package lies in
> (as suggested by Jochen Voss).
Very nice. I am happy to see that the depth is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Nice. :) Wishlist request: could you have it tally the total number of
> packages whose transition depends on each package in the list, and print
> that number next to the source package name? Better yet, could the list be
> s
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:24:33PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> After starting writing a program to help me track my packages
> dependencies for the g++ transition, I decided to put up the results for
> the entire archive in case it was useful for others.
> http://people.debian.org
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> Jochen Voss wrote:
> > Just to let you know: ...
> yep, same bug.
I found another one ;-)
The entry "configlet(configlet-frontends)" should be level 6 instead of 8.
The tree starts out as
configlet-frontends
* python-con
On Monday 18 July 2005 11:23 am, Mike Furr wrote:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > I think you need to take virtual packages into account; apt-based stuff
> > is showing up in Level 1, which AIUI is wrong.
>
> Well, it does the best it can. It resolves all of the information it
> has available. Howe
Hi Mike,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 01:24:33PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote:
> After starting writing a program to help me track my packages
> dependencies for the g++ transition, I decided to put up the results for
> the entire archive in case it was useful for others.
Looks useful.
Just to let you know:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> I think you need to take virtual packages into account; apt-based stuff is
> showing up in Level 1, which AIUI is wrong.
Well, it does the best it can. It resolves all of the information it
has available. However, for examp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Whoops, I see. So, just to further my comprehension here, why doesn't apt
> show up in the dependency tree of aptitude? Obviously libsigc has gone
> through the transition already, so it's not listed, but I'm quite certain
On Monday 18 July 2005 10:24 am, Mike Furr wrote:
> Of course, the results are based on Packages files, which means a lot
> could have happened from the time it was last updated and when you're
> viewing it. So be sure to check with the packages/buildds before doing
> anything. It will be updated
9 matches
Mail list logo
